Use the table below to translate your reserve study’s percent-funded number into an actual next step.
| Percent Funded |
Classification |
Special Assessment Risk |
What the Board Should Do |
| 100%+ |
At or above target |
Minimal |
Confirm the study’s assumptions still hold, and consider whether contributions can level off |
| 70–100% |
Strong |
Low |
Stay the course, and revisit contribution levels at the next study update |
| 30–70% |
Fair |
Moderate |
Increase contributions incrementally over several years, and flag components nearing replacement |
| Below 30% |
Weak |
High |
Build a formal funding plan immediately – a special assessment or reserve loan may already be the likely outcome |
Closing the gap between tiers takes longer than most boards expect.
Moving from 30% funded to 70% – a jump many communities need to make – usually takes three to five years of steadily increased contributions, not one dues adjustment.
Boards that try to close the gap in a single year tend to overcorrect: they hike dues past what owners will tolerate, provoke pushback, and the plan stalls before it’s halfway done.

The fix that works is smaller. A modest, scheduled increase tied to each reserve study update – reviewed whenever the study is refreshed rather than left alone for years – closes the gap without the shock of a sudden jump.
You don’t need a brand-new study to recheck where you land. Between full updates, take last year’s fully funded balance, adjust it for the components you’ve already replaced and for inflation on the rest, and compare it to your current reserve balance. It won’t be as precise as a professional study, but it’s enough to catch a board drifting from 55% funded to 35% funded before the next scheduled update flags it.
None of this requires a finance background on the board. It requires checking your percentage against the table above, then adjusting contributions before the gap widens – not after a roof fails and a special assessment or a loan are the only options left.